![]() |
| Home | Articles | Book Page | Links | Mike's Corner | Search | Studies | Contact Us |
| Reduced Crime beginning 1994, related AP article. |
| While cause and effect are always tough to prove, it should be noted some states saw larger drops in their crime rates than others. It is also true when a large state enacts a major change it affects the national averages. California 3-Strikes started in March 1994. California represents over 11% of the total national population. California reduced its crime at a greater rate than 49 other states. California decreases were twice the national average. Thus California and 3-Strikes has helped drop national averages. |
| Also a major factor was the 1994 National Crime Bill signed into law by then President Clinton. This bill provided federal grant money to hire 100,000 new police officers. |
| While the funding was limited to only 3 years, it was necessary for states to impose a "truth in sentencing" policy for violent offenders; this limited "good time credits" to no more than 15% of total time to be served, meaning that a criminal must serve 85% of his or her sentence. |
| This has taken society's worst off the streets for longer periods of time, thus reducing crime rates. |
| What sociology experts have suggested for years is that crime rates are connected to population age brackets and economic conditions that reduce job availability. |
| This does not prove out. Today we have more people of every age bracket and this has been the worst job market in recent history. |
| So where is the big jump in crime? |
| Related AP article. |
Back the Badge |