Non Gamstop Casinos UKCasinos Not On GamstopNon Gamstop CasinosCasino Sites Not On GamstopCasino Sites Not On Gamstop
Home | Articles | Book Page | Links | Mike's Corner | Search | Studies | Contact Us
 

Table 1: Three-Strike Convictions by County

County

Population Size

Location

Three-Strike
Convictions

State
Percentage

Response

Alameda 1,408,000 Northern 58 1.3 Yes
Alpine 1,200 Northern 0 0.0 Yes
Amador 33,700 Northern 1 0.0
Butte 201,600 Northern 23 0.5
Calavaras 38,350 Northern 0 0.0
Colusa 18,500 Northern 2 0.0 Yes
Contra Costa 900,700 Northern 56 1.3 Yes
Del Norte 28,900 Northern 2 0.0 Yes
El Dorado 147,600 Northern 10 0.2
Fresno 786,800 Central 124 2.8 Yes
Glenn 26,950 Northern 3 0.1
Humboldt 127,700 Northern 0 0.0
Imperial 142,600 Southern 2 0.0
Inyo 18,500 Central 0 0.0 Yes
Kern 639,800 Southern 221 5.1
Kings 122,800 Central 29 0.7
Lake 55,100 Northern 7 0.2
Lassen 34,150 Northern 0 0.0
Los Angeles 9,603,000 Southern 1840 42.1 Yes
Madera 114,300 Central 14 0.3
Marin 245,900 Northern 33 0.8
Mariposa 16,150 Central 1 0.0
Mendocino 86,900 Northern 2 0.0
Merced 204,400 Central 24 0.5
Modoc 10,150 Northern 2 0.0
Mono 10,600 Northern 1 0.0 Yes
Monterey 371,500 Central 22 0.5
Napa 123,300 Northern 11 0.3
Nevada 88,800 Northern 2 0.0
Orange 2,722,300 Southern 239 5.5
Placer 217,900 Northern 9 0.2
Plumas 20,600 Northern 0 0.0
Riverside 1,441,200 Southern 160 3.7 Yes
Sacramento 1,159,000 Northern 254 5.8
San Benito 46,600 Central 3 0.1
San Bernardino 1,624,900 Southern 230 5.3 Yes
San Diego 2,794,800 Southern 411 9.4 Yes
San Francisco 778,100 Northern 22 0.5 Yes
San Joaquin 545,200 Northern 57 1.3
San Luis Obispo 239,000 Southern 15 0.3
San Mateo 715,400 Central 37 0.8 Yes
Santa Barbara 405,000 Southern 38 0.9
Santa Clara 1,689,900 Central 178 4.1 Yes
Santa Cruz 250,200 Central 10 0.2
Shasta 165,000 Northern 20 0.5 Yes
Sierra 3,360 Northern 0 0.0
Siskiyou 44,700 Northern 2 0.0
Solano 383,600 Northern 13 0.3
Sonoma 437,100 Northern 9 0.2 Yes
Stanislaus 427,600 Central 55 1.3 Yes
Sutter 76,800 Northern 2 0.0 Yes
Tehama 55,400 Northern 7 0.2
Trinity 13,250 Northern 4 0.1
Tulare 360,400 Central 58 1.3 Yes
Tuloumne 52,800 Central 2 0.0 Yes
Ventura 730,800 Southern 31 0.7 Yes
Yolo 156,800 Northern 5 0.1
Yuba 61,400 Northern 7 0.2
Overall Total 4368 100.0
Total from Survey Responses 3298 75.5
 
Table 2: Survey Responses Use of Discretion
Files three-strike charges against all eligible defendants Uses discretion to strike a strike in three-strikes cases
68% Yes 92% Yes

32% No

8% No

Frequency of discretion in three-strike cases (DA): Frequency of discretion in three-strike cases (Judge):
30.4% Less than 20% of cases
26.1% 21-40% of cases
17.4% 41-60% of cases
13.0% 61-80% of cases
8.7% More than 80% of cases
4.4% Missing data
72.0% Less than 20% of cases
24.0% 21-40% of cases
0.0% 41-60% of cases
0.0% 61-80% of cases
4.0% More than 80% of cases
 
Reasons for striking a strike: Reasons for not striking a strike:
74.0% Current offense is trivial
65% Prior strikes are remote in time
65% Defendant has no recent criminal history
65% Prior strikes from singular incident
61.0% Proof problems with prior strikes
56.5% Defendant has no history of violence
48% Defendant has never been to prison
43.5% Case likely to end in acquittal
39.0% Defendant has no history of weapons use
39% Defendant has history of mental illness
91.0% Current offense is serious in nature
83.0% Defendant likely to re-offend
83.0% Defendant has history of violence
78.3% Defendant has lengthy criminal record
70.0% Prior strikes are recent in time
65.0% Defendant has history of weapons use
56.5% Prior strikes accumulated separately
48.0% Defendant has prison priors
 
 
Responders allowed to select more than one response
Office has established guidelines for striking a strike: Striking of prior strike done in exchange for guilty plea:
65.2% Yes
34.8% No
39.1% Yes
34.8% No
26.1% Undecided

Although the survey data does not account for all variances within a prosecutor�s office or across jurisdictions, the information does support the rejection of the first hypothesis which states that the use of prosecutorial discretion produces disparity. In justifying this conclusion, several findings can be noted. First, District Attorneys appear to be trying to reduce variation within the jurisdiction through the use of guidelines or other procedures that keep the use of discretion in check. Several of the large jurisdictions, including Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Ventura counties, have established written guidelines which aid deputy prosecutors in their evaluation of cases that seem worthy of discretionary treatment. These guidelines emphasize the need for deputies to strictly adhere to the provisions of the law and often require the approval of a supervisor or other official.

 
10
Next Page

or go to...
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19

 
Back the Badge
return to the Home Page...
Return to Home Page

Great finds